Résumé & Bio
Home page
Weblog
Blog archives
Reason's Hit & Run
The Corvids
LA Examiner
Send E-mail
Reprint Info
All Articles
All Columns


Advertise on LA Blogs

I accept payment through PayPal!, the #1 online payment service! Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

WORK BY SUBJECT
September 11
Journalism
Politics
Nader 2000
All Nader
International
L.A./California
New Media
Music
Economics
Sports
Profiles

BY PUBLICATION
Reason
National Post
L.A. Daily News
ESPN/Sportsjones
NewsForChange
OJR
Pitt. Post-Gazette
Tabloid.net
Zone News
Wired News
Prognosis
Freelance

Press
Wedding

STAR CHAMBER
Emmanuelle Richard
* photoblog
Ken Layne
Laura Crane
Ben's Science Blog
Tony Pierce
* bus blog
* photoblog
Kate Sullivan
Eric Neel
Amy Langfield
* photoblog
Greg McIlvaine
Molli
Jim Lowney
Tim Blair
Heather Havrilesky
* hazel motes
Catherine Seipp
Cecile DuBois
Jill Stewart
Amy Alkon
Howard Owens
Brian Linse
Marc Brown
* Buzznet
* photoblog
Bonnie Bills
Ken Basart
Doug Arellanes
* photoblog
Jeff Jarvis
Nick Denton
David Galbraith
Henry Copeland
Rick Bruner
Christopher Scheer
Alex Zucker
Paul Wilson
Elizabeth Stromme
Barry Langer
Ed Mazza
Oakland Sun
Dan Hilldale
S.K. Smith
Tsar
The Luxus
Psoma
Rick Royale
Stig Roar Husby

NEWS SMACK
Glenn Reynolds
Google News
Yahoo News
Matt Drudge
Rough & Tumble
Technorati
Blogdex

DAILY PLEASURES
Dr. Frank
Colby Cosh
Achewood
Scott MacMillan
Sgt. Stryker
Virginia Postrel
Various Volokhs
Mickey Kaus
Bjorn Staerk
James Lileks
Harry's Place
Michael Olson
Elizabeth Spiers
* The Kicker
Gawker
Dave Barry
Blogcritics

PLANET REASON
Reason
Hit & Run
Jesse Walker
Brian Doherty
Sara Grace
Tim Cavanaugh
Julian Sanchez
RiShawn Biddle
Jeremy Lott
Michael Young
Rick Henderson
John Hood
Brink Lindsey
Charles Oliver
Marginal Revolution
Guardian's Kick-AAS
Privatization

POLITICAL JUNKIES
Matthew Yglesias
Andrew Sullivan
Kevin Drum
Daniel Drezner
Roger Simon
Michael Totten
Oliver Willis
Henry Hanks
Josh Marshall
Brad DeLong
Asymmetrical Information
Mark Kleiman
Atrios
Geitner Simmons

L.A./CALIFORNIA
L.A. Observed
Daniel Weintraub
Nancy Rommelmann
Pieter K
Luke Ford
Luke Thompson
Steve Smith
Robert Tagorda
Franklin Avenue
Joel Kotkin
L.A. Press Club
L.A. Blogs
California Authors
Daily News
L.A. Business Journal
L.A. Alternative Press
L.A. City Beat
L.A. Innuendo
Tony Millionaire
Richard Bennett
William Quick
Joanne Jacobs
Steven Den Beste
Xeni Jardin
Madison Slade
Greg Beato
Rand Simberg
Martin Devon
Ann Salisbury
Bob Morris
Armed Liberal
Justene Adamec
Rick Hasen
Greg Ransom
Chris Weinkopf
Hugh Hewitt
Rip Rense

WRITERS
Christopher Hitchens
Mark Steyn
Hunter Thompson
Warren Hinckle
Merle Haggard
Malcolm Gladwell
Johann Hari

MEDIA STUFF
Jim Romenesko
I Want Media
Media Bistro
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
E-Media Tidbits
Declan McCullagh
Tom Mangan
Al Giordano
Jay Rosen
Tom Tomorrow
Spinsanity
J.D. Lasica
BlogCount

BEISBOL
Baseball Crank
Baseball Primer
Baseball Prospectus
Baseball-Reference.com
Doug Pappas
Dr. Manhattan
Eric McErlain
Mudville Magazine
Rob Neyer
David Pinto
Win Shares
Cuba News

MAGS & TANKS
Economist
Atlantic
New Yorker
International Herald Tribune
Guardian Blog
New Republic
* & etc.
Weekly Standard
National Review
* The Corner
American Prospect
* Tapped
American Spectator
NY Review o' Books
City Journal
TechCentralStation
Cato
Claremont Institute
Center for Am. Progress

WAR NEWS
Command Post
Salam Pax
Fred Pruitt
Citizen Smash
Phil Carter
Kevin Sites
Iraq News
Christopher Allbritton
Peter Maass

BLOG NAUSEUM
Geoffrey Barto
Sergio Bichao
Bloopy
Paul Boutin
Moira Breen
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Susanna Cornett
Crooked Timber
Charles Dodgson
Ben Domenech
Vicky Drachenberg
Dean Esmay
Gary Farber
Juan Gato
Ken Goldstein
Vodka Steve Green
Andrea Harris
John Hawkins
Lawrence Haws
P. Nielsen Hayden
Jim Henley
David Janes
Charles Johnson
Emily Jones
Orrin Judd
Benjamin Kepple
Steve Kercher
Kathy Kinsley
Alex Knapp
Charles Kuffner
Kevin Mickey
Jackson Murphy
Iain Murray
Thomas Nephew
Fredrik Norman
Andrew Northrup
Shannon Okey
Dawn Olsen
Brendan O'Neill
Oxblog
Damian Penny
Lynxx Pherrett
Neal Pollack
Max Power
Bruce Rolston
Scott Rosenberg
Scott Rubush
Max Sawicky
Samizdata
Fritz Schranck
Angie Schultz
Doc Searls
Ben Sheriff
Arthur Silber
Natalie Solent
Ginger Stampley
Reid Stott
Anthony Swenson
Mac Thomason
Jim Treacher
Eve Tushnet
Cal Ulmann
Marc Valles
John Weidner
Marc Weisblott
Kevin Whited
Will Wilkinson
Derek Willis
Pejman Y…

In Association with Amazon.com Tsar

A Peace To End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East
David Fromkin

From Beirut to Jerusalem
Thomas L. Friedman

Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990
Vaclav Havel

My Country Right or Left 1940-1943: The Collected Essays Journalism & Letters of George Orwell

A Heart Turned East: Among the Muslims of Europe and America
Adam LeBor

History of the Present: Essays, Sketches, and Dispatches from Europe in the 1990s
Timothy Garton Ash

The Future and Its Enemies: The Growing Conflict over Creativity, Enterprise and Progress
Virginia Postrel

The Gallery of Regrettable Food
James Lileks

Rebels on the Air: An Alternative History of Radio in America
Jesse Walker

Counter Intelligence: Where to Eat in the Real Los Angeles
Jonathan Gold

The Pride of Havana: A History of Cuban Baseball
Roberto Gonzales Echevarria

The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract

Win Shares
Bill James


All Contents
© 1986-2004










It's Always Nice to Learn What I Really Meant, as Opposed to What I Really Wrote: Over at the Village Voice, Roy Edroso writes this strange history of "warblogging":

[W]ith the rush to war in Iraq came the phenomenon of "warbloggers" -- online belligerents who hollered for invasion and denounced all foot-draggers as traitors. They thought themselves a new breed of patriot, rescuing the nation from post-Vietnam drift, but were merely a useful feeder stream for a new jingoism that enmeshed America in foreign morasses wherein we remain hopelessly bound today.

One of the warblogs OGs, Matt Welch, looked back in 2006 on those heady times and reflected, "Man, was I wrong." Nonetheless he admitted, "I can't shake the feeling of nostalgia for a promising cross-partisan moment that just fizzled away." By "cross-partisan," of course, he meant that some people joined his bellowing who later grew hoarse and unsure; there were others who disagreed from the start, but they were disregarded, because they were not part of the great new blog thing.

I've got no issue with anyone flinging well-deserved poo at a category of human I indeed helped give name to. But read that squib without clicking on the links and you'd think that warblogging became a phenomenon in 2003, that I was one of those hollering for war against Iraq, and that my mea culpa was a direct reference to this pro-war belligerence. All are false.

"Warblogging" came to prominence not during the run-up to the Iraq War, but in the run-up to the Afghanistan War. In fact many early adopters of the term, me included, originally meant the phrase as much as anything as a sort of verbal slap in the face to describe what Islamic terrorists were already waging against us. It's a fair bet that James Wolcott, to name one of many presumably Edroso-approved examples, would not have found warblogs "so damn addictive" back in the spring of 2002 had they been primarily or even tertiarily organized around the concept of toppling Saddam Hussein.

Speaking of which, on that score I was Hamlet, not Dick Cheney. While you can say plenty against such punditorial indecisiveness, what you can't say (at least while pretending to care about the truth) is that it "denounced all foot-draggers as traitors." Here are five mattwelch.com links in February/March of 2003: You make the call.

Why does Edroso go to such lengths in warping a record that's plenty rich enough for criticism? Unlike him, I won't pretend to go in the opposing corner's brain. Instead I will merely observe that all of the above bullshittery is in prelude to the remarkable claim about what I really meant in my Farewell to Warblogging column, presented with the usual straight-from-the-arse tell of "of course." Namely, that I was lamenting "that some people" who "joined" my "bellowing" eventually "grew hoarse and unsure."

Sounds like my wrath was aimed at liberal hawks who got wobbly! Uh, not fucking remotely:

As a consumer, it was exponentially more edifying to me than the post-9/11 fumblings of the mainstream media's binary, Crossfire-style opinion slinging. "What do warbloggers have in common, that most pundits do not?" I enthused [in this December 2001 post]. "I'd say a yen for critical thinking, a sense of humor that actually translates into people laughing out loud, a willingness to engage (and encourage) readers, a hostility to the Culture War and other artifacts of the professionalized left-right split of the 1990s...a readiness to admit error [and] a sense of collegial yet brutal peer review."

Man, was I wrong.

Michelle Malkin, to name one writer revered by warbloggers (her site recently won Best Blog in an annual poll organized by RightWingNews.com), is to critical thinking what Ralph Nader is to libertarianism—a very good example of the opposite. The basic scholarship of her 2004 book In Defense of Internment was cut to ribbons by Japanese-internment historian Eric L. Muller (see "Indefensible Internment," December 2004), yet many of the same people who once trumpeted bloggers' ability to "fact-check your ass" simply shrugged, continued treating Malkin as a trustworthy source, and saved their real journalism criticism for those partisan hacks at CBS News and The New York Times.

It's fitting that Edroso's fantasia comes in the service of a column that attempts to affix blame for "ruin[ing] the Internet." The Internet ain't remotely ruined, and one of the main reasons why it isn't (and why certain grumps will grouse at the digital world passing them by) is that you can actually click through that hyperlink and discover that the writer talking so confidently is, in fact, full of shit.

UPDATE: Oh hey look, jackass saved the best for his personal site:

the warblogger era ('member that?), when alleged former liberals like Matt Welch and Jeff Jarvis would bellow that the scales had been torn from their eyes, revealing to them the necessity of invading Iraq. I notice that they're not similarly rallying to the call to invade Yemen, which suggests such epiphanies have a more limited shelf life than once was thought, as well as a longer, subsequent period of buyer's remorse.
To sum up: Before the Iraq War, I wasn't sure what the U.S. should do, was respectful of differing views, and expressed both sentiments a half-dozen times on my "warblog." Through the sour lens of a Village Voice writer, that means I denounced fence-sitters (such as, um, myself?) as "traitors," disgorged several lifetimes' worth of pro-Iraq War "bellowing," then began a long, slow marination in my own regret.

Seriously, dude, at least Glenn Greenwald knows how to use a basic search button.

UPDATE II: Hey look again! Dude found the search button! But instead of saying "Whoops! I was totally wrong about saying Welch bellowed support for the war and dismissed fence-sitters as traitors," he quotes a couple of my pacifist-bashing posts from September of 2001, grudgingly acknowledges that the "Farewell to Warblogging" column he so grossly mischaracterized "doesn't say much about the war part" (ya think, Roy?), makes comments throughout about how "angry" I am (honey, like Tom Petty, I'm laughing all the time), then finishes with this whimper:

Nonetheless some people, including many less critical than me, got the impression the warbloggers supported some wars. So maybe "warblogging" was a misnomer all along, and they should have called it critical-thinkingblogging, or laughing-out-loudblogging. That might have cleared up some confusion, and spared us all some grief.
Oh boo hoo. "Warblog" had long morphed into an outsider term of derision as much as and probably more than an in-group identifier by the moment Edroso originally pegged as the advent of warblogging. As a would-be media critic, the onus is on him to figure out what the hell he's talking about.

EXCITING UPDATE III!: Another update from Edroso's latest post says, of my description of him spelunking through my September 2001 archives, "maybe he think's I'm cherry picking!" Not at all, Roy; there's a lot of harsh business in there, some that makes me wince in retrospect. What I do think you're doing is changing the subject from your utterly, laughably, provably false assertions about me "bellowing" support for invading Iraq by quoting from stuff I wrote 18 months before that war started (and just days after terrorists pulverized 3,000 people on American soil). You made multiple assertions about me that were false, a fact that no amount of post-9/11 Robert Jensen-bashing on my part has any relevance to. Keep on digging, though!

AND THE FINAL UPDATE: The Village Voice has run my letter. Edroso, after admitting that his dating was wrong & that the pro-war stuff should not have been applied to me, then says this:

Welch spent much of his early warblogging days (and some of his later ones) beating up opponents of the war(s). ("I understand today -- really, for the first time in my life -- why for much of Middle America the word 'liberal' is a pejorative," etc). I suppose you could say this is not the same thing as being an "advocate for war." I think it's a distinction without a difference.
And there you have it. Spending my Sept. 16, 2001 criticizing Noam Chomsky for equating the massacre of five days earlier with Bill Clinton's bombing of a Sudanese pharmaceuticals factory, and Colman McCarthy for advocating that we react to the hijackers by saying "we forgive you," is no different than being an advocate for the Iraq War, even if I wasn't, um, an advocate for the Iraq War. Facts, schmacts, etc. I hope this has been as weirdly (if dully) illuminating for all of you as it has been for me.

01/04/2010 05:07 AM  |  Comment (12)

Hi! What are you doing down here?

© 1986-2004; All rights reserved.