Résumé & Bio
Home page
Blog archives
Reason's Hit & Run
The Corvids
LA Examiner
Send E-mail
Reprint Info
All Articles
All Columns

Advertise on LA Blogs

I accept payment through PayPal!, the #1 online payment service! Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

September 11
Nader 2000
All Nader
New Media

National Post
L.A. Daily News
Pitt. Post-Gazette
Zone News
Wired News


Emmanuelle Richard
* photoblog
Ken Layne
Laura Crane
Ben's Science Blog
Tony Pierce
* bus blog
* photoblog
Kate Sullivan
Eric Neel
Amy Langfield
* photoblog
Greg McIlvaine
Jim Lowney
Tim Blair
Heather Havrilesky
* hazel motes
Catherine Seipp
Cecile DuBois
Jill Stewart
Amy Alkon
Howard Owens
Brian Linse
Marc Brown
* Buzznet
* photoblog
Bonnie Bills
Ken Basart
Doug Arellanes
* photoblog
Jeff Jarvis
Nick Denton
David Galbraith
Henry Copeland
Rick Bruner
Christopher Scheer
Alex Zucker
Paul Wilson
Elizabeth Stromme
Barry Langer
Ed Mazza
Oakland Sun
Dan Hilldale
S.K. Smith
The Luxus
Rick Royale
Stig Roar Husby

Glenn Reynolds
Google News
Yahoo News
Matt Drudge
Rough & Tumble

Dr. Frank
Colby Cosh
Scott MacMillan
Sgt. Stryker
Virginia Postrel
Various Volokhs
Mickey Kaus
Bjorn Staerk
James Lileks
Harry's Place
Michael Olson
Elizabeth Spiers
* The Kicker
Dave Barry

Hit & Run
Jesse Walker
Brian Doherty
Sara Grace
Tim Cavanaugh
Julian Sanchez
RiShawn Biddle
Jeremy Lott
Michael Young
Rick Henderson
John Hood
Brink Lindsey
Charles Oliver
Marginal Revolution
Guardian's Kick-AAS

Matthew Yglesias
Andrew Sullivan
Kevin Drum
Daniel Drezner
Roger Simon
Michael Totten
Oliver Willis
Henry Hanks
Josh Marshall
Brad DeLong
Asymmetrical Information
Mark Kleiman
Geitner Simmons

L.A. Observed
Daniel Weintraub
Nancy Rommelmann
Pieter K
Luke Ford
Luke Thompson
Steve Smith
Robert Tagorda
Franklin Avenue
Joel Kotkin
L.A. Press Club
L.A. Blogs
California Authors
Daily News
L.A. Business Journal
L.A. Alternative Press
L.A. City Beat
L.A. Innuendo
Tony Millionaire
Richard Bennett
William Quick
Joanne Jacobs
Steven Den Beste
Xeni Jardin
Madison Slade
Greg Beato
Rand Simberg
Martin Devon
Ann Salisbury
Bob Morris
Armed Liberal
Justene Adamec
Rick Hasen
Greg Ransom
Chris Weinkopf
Hugh Hewitt
Rip Rense

Christopher Hitchens
Mark Steyn
Hunter Thompson
Warren Hinckle
Merle Haggard
Malcolm Gladwell
Johann Hari

Jim Romenesko
I Want Media
Media Bistro
American Journalism Review
Columbia Journalism Review
E-Media Tidbits
Declan McCullagh
Tom Mangan
Al Giordano
Jay Rosen
Tom Tomorrow
J.D. Lasica

Baseball Crank
Baseball Primer
Baseball Prospectus
Doug Pappas
Dr. Manhattan
Eric McErlain
Mudville Magazine
Rob Neyer
David Pinto
Win Shares
Cuba News

New Yorker
International Herald Tribune
Guardian Blog
New Republic
* & etc.
Weekly Standard
National Review
* The Corner
American Prospect
* Tapped
American Spectator
NY Review o' Books
City Journal
Claremont Institute
Center for Am. Progress

Command Post
Salam Pax
Fred Pruitt
Citizen Smash
Phil Carter
Kevin Sites
Iraq News
Christopher Allbritton
Peter Maass

Geoffrey Barto
Sergio Bichao
Paul Boutin
Moira Breen
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Susanna Cornett
Crooked Timber
Charles Dodgson
Ben Domenech
Vicky Drachenberg
Dean Esmay
Gary Farber
Juan Gato
Ken Goldstein
Vodka Steve Green
Andrea Harris
John Hawkins
Lawrence Haws
P. Nielsen Hayden
Jim Henley
David Janes
Charles Johnson
Emily Jones
Orrin Judd
Benjamin Kepple
Steve Kercher
Kathy Kinsley
Alex Knapp
Charles Kuffner
Kevin Mickey
Jackson Murphy
Iain Murray
Thomas Nephew
Fredrik Norman
Andrew Northrup
Shannon Okey
Dawn Olsen
Brendan O'Neill
Damian Penny
Lynxx Pherrett
Neal Pollack
Max Power
Bruce Rolston
Scott Rosenberg
Scott Rubush
Max Sawicky
Fritz Schranck
Angie Schultz
Doc Searls
Ben Sheriff
Arthur Silber
Natalie Solent
Ginger Stampley
Reid Stott
Anthony Swenson
Mac Thomason
Jim Treacher
Eve Tushnet
Cal Ulmann
Marc Valles
John Weidner
Marc Weisblott
Kevin Whited
Will Wilkinson
Derek Willis
Pejman Y…

In Association with Amazon.com Tsar

A Peace To End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East
David Fromkin

From Beirut to Jerusalem
Thomas L. Friedman

Open Letters: Selected Writings, 1965-1990
Vaclav Havel

My Country Right or Left 1940-1943: The Collected Essays Journalism & Letters of George Orwell

A Heart Turned East: Among the Muslims of Europe and America
Adam LeBor

History of the Present: Essays, Sketches, and Dispatches from Europe in the 1990s
Timothy Garton Ash

The Future and Its Enemies: The Growing Conflict over Creativity, Enterprise and Progress
Virginia Postrel

The Gallery of Regrettable Food
James Lileks

Rebels on the Air: An Alternative History of Radio in America
Jesse Walker

Counter Intelligence: Where to Eat in the Real Los Angeles
Jonathan Gold

The Pride of Havana: A History of Cuban Baseball
Roberto Gonzales Echevarria

The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract

Win Shares
Bill James

All Contents
© 1986-2004

Cavanaugh Chases Down ‘Bug-Chasing’: Valuable little media-research exercise. Me, I miss the days of the dreaded “Ice” epidemic.

01/25/2003 10:54 AM  |  Comment (1)

New National Post Column From Me -- ‘Let Them Eat Bagels!’: It’s a meandering little number that criticizes the New York Times, not for partisanship, but for swallowing up the International Herald Tribune. Somehow this leads into a discussion about McDonald’s, Southern California shopping malls, hyper-capitalism, and the ravenous hunger for all things local. Got it?

01/25/2003 09:51 AM  |  Comment (1)

Dave Barry’s Blog Now Readable: Thanks, for some reason, to Ken Layne.

01/24/2003 08:33 PM  |  Comment (3)

L.A. Times Less Critical of Chomsky Than L.A. Weekly: Here’s Kenneth Turan’s review of the documentary mentioned below. Sample:

Because Chomsky is so lucid and because his point of view is so rarely heard, "Power and Terror" is a stimulating experience as the man lets us know, for instance, that he considers speaking truth to power to be a waste of time because power already knows the truth.

01/24/2003 11:08 AM  |  Comment (5)

Great Nick Denton Column on the Troubles and Hopes of American Media: Of course, it helps that I agree with him.

01/24/2003 11:02 AM  |  Comment (2)

BlogAds Gets Fancier: Go check out Henry Copeland’s improvements, and advertise on your favorite weblogs!

01/23/2003 01:22 PM  | 

A Sympathetic Lefty Fact-Checks Chomsky: Tacked onto the end of a little L.A. Weekly review of some new hagiographic documentary of Noam Chomsky, sympathetic-but-critical L.A. lefty Marc Cooper drops this important little bit of eyewitness fact-checking (italics mine):

In one particularly off-the-wall moment, Chomsky argues that while we mourn the 3,000 who died in the twin towers, we pay no attention to the roughly equivalent number of civilians who perished when — he says — the U.S. bombed the Panamanian neighborhood of Chorillo during the American invasion of 1989. I was in that neighborhood mere days after it was razed, and Chomsky is just plain wrong: It wasn't bombed. It burned down after a firefight between U.S. and Panamanian troops. And as reprehensible as the U.S. invasion was, Panama's own human-rights commission claims that a total of maybe 400 people -- soldiers and civilians — died during the entire conflict.

01/22/2003 07:34 PM  |  Comment (44)

Check out our Fancy Logo!:

01/22/2003 06:10 PM  |  Comment (1)

Correction: Ten months ago, I criticized Ted Rueter for engaging in hyperbole when he wrote about the scourge of “acoustic terrorism.” Today, Rueter e-mails:

don't you think it would be a good idea if you bothered to spell my name correctly?
Indeed I do. The first post had it R-e-u-t-e-r, like the news agency (which would probably prefer “acoustic freedom fighting,” anyway … badda-boom!). Sorry, Ted!

01/22/2003 12:36 PM  |  Comment (1)

L.A. Times, on Riordan’s Los Angeles Examiner: Here’s the Tim Rutten story, here’s the LAX post. Lots of quotes from Layne. My favorite:

We hope to be available in supermarkets I can't afford, like Gelson's.

01/21/2003 08:08 PM  | 

‘It’s Too Bad Matt Welch Has Gone AWOL on us’: The blogger known as Decnavda writes:

The entire pundacracy, including in the blogisphere, is seriously out of touch with mainstream opinion. Every pundit I have read so far is either for an attack on Iraq regardless of the U.N., or against an attack on Iraq, regardless of the U.N. Has any opinion-giver out there come out in favor of an attack only if the U.N. approves? Like, apparently, half the American population?

It's too bad Matt Welch has gone AWOL on us...

He’s an e-mail chum, so I wrote him an intensely muddled response, which he swore I should post here. I’ll do so, against my better judgment, and with the caveat that I refuse to argue with any of you in the comments section about any of this, on account of I'm aware it's incoherent & filled with basic errors of ignorance.
Dear Decnavda,

Where's your blog? I'll post a link immediately!

A short & flippant answer to your question can be found here; mostly, my views on the whole thing are very mixed, so I've found it more useful to probe the issue through journalism, not opinionated hectoring. I'm very glad there are weapons inspectors in Iraq, and I believe they wouldn't be there today if Bush hadn't threatened a unilateral war. I even have pretty strong hope that there won't be a war, and that this is all a very elaborate (and on some counts, effective) bluff. Does that mean Bush should have threatened war? I don't know! Does that mean that the poisonous relationship with Saudi Arabia gets tabled yet again? Looks like it! (See Deals With the Devil.) Does the whole process seem to extend America's power, which is ultimately dangerous no matter how nobly expended (not to say that it's being nobly expended now)? I think so! (See: The U.S. Version of Adult Supervision and Weaning Europeans from America’s Teat.) Is there any chance in hell the U.S. will launch a "unilateral" war? No! (England, for one, will stand shoulder-to-Anglo-Saxon-shoulder).

Etc. Whatever happens, I have the distinct feeling that the U.N. will approve of it. I think it's eminently possible that Saddam will be spirited away to some dreadful country. I'd love to see him go, and I'm worried about the Doctrine of Pre-emptive Regime Change.

I breathe easier knowing that there are inspectors in Iraq. It gets more labored when thinking about Bush's secrecy, his Administration's Saudi dealings, and the scatter-brained policy toward North Korea. What I'm trying to say here Decnavda is that I'M PRETTY CONFLICTED ABOUT IT ALL. I hope there's no war, I hope Saddam is removed, I even kinda hope the Kurds get their own country, though my ignorance on that count is stunning. I hope France stays obstructionist, and that Blair's lip remains stiff. I hope that we drastically cut back and/or eliminate the sale and donation of weapons to repressive regimes, and I include Turkey and Israel on that list. I hope Sharon loses big, that the settlements are pulled back, and that Arafat crawls off to Mordor. I hope the Democrats run against Dubya's Saudi chumminess, his tightening of civil liberties (especially the right of the accused to have legal counsel, and their whereabouts known), and his incoherent Homeland Security program. I think the Dept. of Homeland Security is a terrible idea, and that anyone named "Poindexter," "Abrams," "Negroponte" and "Reich" should be sent on the slow boat to Mauritius.

Finally, I have been A) in Europe for a month, B) busy with putting together a newspaper. I feel that my use is best served exploring my conflicted feelings by asking questions. Three questions I'll be asking in upcoming columns: Is Bush Bluffing? Should the U.S. Uphold Random Borders Containing Multiple Competing Ethnicities? And, How Have Immigration Politics and Policy Changed, Concretely, Since Sept. 11?

Now I have to get back to work. I grow weary of reading yet another schmuck's opinion about the War, pro or con, and see no great reason in arguing my bizarre position. As usual, people seem to have drifted into enemy camps, and wandering into their polemics is as pleasant as plucking my own nosehair. At some point I'll address that mutual intolerance & incoherence, because it's interesting, but for now I'm more interested in meeting the trillion deadlines that are competing on my desk.


01/21/2003 08:02 PM  |  Comment (26)

Stick to Politics, Steve-O: Steve Forbes, in a three-dot column, describes Sandy Koufax as “arguably the finest pitcher ever,” and then gets to the real hyperbole:

He had an almost Lincolnesque combination of intense ambition, genuine humility and principle (he refused to pitch the first game in the 1965 World Series because it fell on Yom Kippur). He came up with pioneering insights into the art and physics of pitching, and he was amazingly stoic when he was in intense pain during a game.

The Dodgers offense in Koufax's peak years was awful. His incredible win-loss record -- 129-47 in that period -- would have been even better had he been with a team that could score more than one or two runs per game.

I’m too busy with matters of non-trivial importance to refute this at length, but as people who actually pay attention to baseball have pointed out before, A) Sandy Koufax pitched extraordinarily for five seasons; the Hall of Fame is filled with pitchers who were excellent for more than 10. He was “arguably” among the finest pitchers ever at his peak, but had 20 fewer victories in his career than David Wells. B) His five peak years coincided with five of the most pitcher-friendly years in the history of baseball, during which he pitched in the most difficult stadium in the league to hit. His home E.R.A. from 1962-66 was 1.37, while on the road it was a more human 2.57. That’s some home-field advantage. C) That stoicism in the face of pain and misuse cut short his career. D) The Dodgers offense in that period was good, not “awful.” According to Bill James’ “The Politics of Glory,” L.A. ranked second in a 10-team league in runs scored on the road in both 1963 and ’64. In ’63, that meant 344 runs in 81 road games. That’s four-plus runs a game, not “one or two.”

Why the hell am I writing about this? Blowing off steam for a half-second. Also, Koufax has been surrounded with just an ungodly amount of hyperbole in the last year or two. I once did research for a nice long debunking of the the most common Koufax myths, then I remembered that I rarely write about sports for money, so I got back to the War or whatever. Sandy was marvelous enough without the comparisons to Abraham Lincoln.

01/21/2003 07:38 PM  |  Comment (12)

Joke of the Day: Care of the Los Angeles Times.

Salon is perhaps the last great independent experiment in online journalism.
Someone with a Lexis password should count the number of 1,000-word-plus features the L.A. Times has published about Salon over the past seven years. I would wager that it’s higher than the number of stories on all the other news/opinion websites combined. UPDATE: Colby Cosh, as usual, is funnier.

01/21/2003 06:21 PM  | 

A Nice Wet Kiss for Cavanaugh: Village Voice media writer Cynthia Cotts details the Suckification of Reason, and heaps credit on Our Tim while getting in a few mild digs at Nick Gillespie’s vocabulary. Nice one, boys! I applied a sloppy one of my own on the Cavanaugh-era Suck just after it died. Seems like about 12 lives ago …

01/21/2003 11:02 AM  | 

Hi! What are you doing down here?

© 1986-2004; All rights reserved.